| 2005 Cross Reference Study - Sasquatch Characteristics in South Central US - Introduction |
|
|
|
| Written by Mark Banta | ||||||||
| Friday, 25 November 2005 | ||||||||
Page 6 of 6
ConclusionsI feel it necessary to again re-emphasize the purpose of this study. I hoped to gain a general description of what a Sasquatch creature in the South Central part of the United States might look like. I feel as though I have offered the best possible description that can be given to-date with the information that is currently available. I obviously took a lot of liberty in some sections to come up with a viable conclusion to the data. This leads us to an interesting point. I originally started out trying to find physical characteristics. However, the most important thing I learned is that we need standardized questions for investigators to use when making a report. Without common variables we will not be able to conduct proper cross-reference studies that could prove invaluable in determining a number of characteristics and behaviors this creature may possess. To summarize, I have broken down each category and given the final conclusions for each. The following is what a Sasquatch in South Central United States looks like according to my interpretation of the data:
In closing, I would like to encourage all reading this report to draw your own conclusions from this data. If you are artistically inclined, we at SRI would love to see your renditions of a Sasquatch based on your interpretations of this data. Author’s Note: The reports analyzed in this study were gathered at www.bfro.net in the sightings section. The following reports were used: 1297, 3042, 2018, 8591, 5681, 5620, 7473, 8543, 10074, 9376, 400, 2399, 8083, 7670, 8909, 9169, 8039, 7168, 8376, 10272, 9305, 4337, 9387, 7907, 7548, 7632, 10733, 6941, 6433, 11543, 8547, 9862, 8790, 9867, 2388, 1461, 1458, 1536, 10919, 9753, 8527, 3226, 10913, 5316, 1356, 2180, 4421, 1326, 1325, and 2033. |
||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|